Search for: "Person v. General Motors Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2011, 3:10 pm by John Bruce
General Motors Corp., 2011 WI 52 (July 11, 2011), the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that personal jurisdiction of a defendant under Wisconsin's "long-arm statute" cannot be based merely on its agency relationship with an entity having sufficient contacts with the state. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
If it's a motor vehicle accident, then the attorney is hired to prosecute the personal injury action, up to and including trial. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Yazzie, supra.The opinion goes on to explain that under the MFRA, No person shall drive an uninsured motor vehicle, or a motor vehicle for which evidence of financial responsibility as was affirmed to the department is not currently valid, upon the streets or highways of New Mexico unless the person is specifically exempted from the provisions of the [MFRA].Section 66–5–205(B). [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
The Motor Vehicle Accident, Death and TextingThis post examines a recent opinion the Supreme Court -Genesee County, New York issued in a civil case: Vega v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 2:30 pm
Some might argue that with these decisions, common sense has ultimately prevailed.For full text of the two Supreme Court of Canada decisions see:Citadel General Assurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
§ 15.26 Several Liability as a General Rule The Case: McIntyre v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Argentina that foreign nations are not “persons” is simply wrong, as is the Second Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in Frontera Resources Azerbaijan Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
General Motors Corp, 243 F.3d 441 (8th Cir. 2001), the district court excluded evidence of the minor injuries of the driver of the vehicle in which the plaintiff was riding in the front passenger seat. ld. at 445. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:29 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Target Corp., July 15, 2014, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog Florida Appeals Court Refuses to Order Neurological Exam Absent Good Cause in Negligence Case: Gray v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
AUTO - HOMEOWNERS - CGL - ATV ACCIDENT - MOTORIZED LAND VEHICLE EXCLUSION - AGENT/BROKER E&O Picone v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:59 pm
PERSONAL AUTO – THIRD-PARTY DIMINISHED VALUE – COST OF REPAIRS – MEASURE OF RECOVERABLE DAMAGES Franklin Corp. v Prahler (4th Dept., decided 11/10/2011)  Spoiler alert: it could be said that this decision makes new law in New York on the issue of whether third-party diminution of value damages for a motor vehicle are recoverable in addition to the cost of repairs even if the repairs restore the vehicle to its pre-accident condition. [read post]