Search for: "Persons v. Cochran" Results 1 - 20 of 203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Post-Cochran BYOD Class Actions: Who’s an Employer To Call?
5 Mar 2015, 9:44 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In Araiza v. [read post]
California Peculiarities Employment Law Blog - http://www.calpeculiarities.com/
Cochrane goes to the ASA in latest Adwords development in South Africa
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am by Darren Olivier
‘The ASA then referred to Revivo Tea v P Linzer / 13898 (29 June 2011), Loan Discovery SA v Brown / 21626 (17 April 2013) and the websites, http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/A/adwords.html and http://www.google.co.za/adwords/how-it-works/ , in coming to its decision that an Adword is not regarded as the “advertisement” itself, but merely as a trigger that ensures that a person’s advertisement is displayed. [read post]
Afro-IP - http://afro-ip.blogspot.com/
Tennessee Service of Process and the Statute of Limitations in Personal Injury Cases -- Cristy Irene Fair v. Stephen Lynn Cochran
18 Dec 2013, 9:23 am
In Fair v. [read post]
Tennessee Injury Attorney Blog - http://www.tennesseeinjuryattorneyblog.com/
Cochran v. Schwan’s Home Service: Employer Must Reimburse Employees for Work-Related Use of Cell Phones; Individual Questions as to Damages Do Not Justify Denial of Class Certification
21 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
In Cochran v. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
Employers Must Reimburse Employees For Mandatory Personal Cellphone Use
29 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Arkady Itkin
In the opening line of Cochran v. [read post]
San Francisco Employment Law Firm Blawg - http://www.sanfranciscoemploymentlawfirm.com/
Employers Must Reimburse Employees For Mandatory Personal Cellphone Use
29 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Arkady Itkin
In the opening line of Cochran v. [read post]
San Francisco Employment Law Firm Blawg - http://www.sanfranciscoemploymentlawfirm.com/
Hold The Line: Employers On The Hook For “Reasonable Percentage” Of Personal Cell Phone Expenses If Employee Uses Phone For Work
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Michele Haydel Gehrke In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. [read post]
California Peculiarities Employment Law Blog - http://www.calpeculiarities.com/
Personal cell phones at work: Five lessons employers should take away about expense reimbursement set forth in Cochran v. Schwan’s Home Services
6 Mar 2015, 12:07 am by Anthony Zaller
In Cochran v. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
New Threat to "Bring Your Own Device" Policies: Employer Required to Reimburse Personal Cell Phone Expenses
3 Sep 2014, 12:00 pm
The Advisory discusses a far-reaching decision by the California Second District Court of Appeal in Cochran v. [read post]
Gravel2Gavel Construction Law Blog - http://www.gravel2gavel.com/
Personal cell phones at work: Five lessons employers should take away about expense reimbursement set forth in Cochran v. Schwan's Home Services
6 Mar 2015, 8:07 am by Anthony Zaller
In Cochran v. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
California Court of Appeal Rules Employers Must Reimburse Employees For Work Calls on Personal Cell Phones
26 Sep 2014, 3:00 am by Bryan Hawkins
The California Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Cochran v. [read post]
Stoel Rives World of Employment - http://www.stoelrivesworldofemployment.com/
Cell Phone Reimbursement Ruling Will Stand
12 Dec 2014, 9:30 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
The California Supreme Court recently denied a request to review Cochran v. [read post]
HR Watchdog - http://hrwatchdog.calchamber.com/
Ind. Decisions - 7th Circuit decides one Indiana case today
16 Jul 2008, 7:49 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/
Cochran v. Norkunas (Ct. of Appeals)
21 Mar 2007, 9:56 am
Upon reviewing the LOI, the Court concluded that a reasonable person would have understood the LOI to mean that a formal contract offer was to follow the letter of intent. [read post]
Maryland Courts Watcher - http://marylandcourts.blogspot.com/
CA Employers Liable For Employees’ Work-Related Cell Phone Calls Even If Such Calls Cannot Be Isolated on Phone Bills
26 Aug 2014, 2:29 pm
Cochran v. [read post]
Impact Litigation Journal - http://www.impactlitigation.com/
Godzilla v. Mothra
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
That sound everyone in Texas heard at around 9:17 a.m. this morning was Judge Cochran squealing with glee. [read post]
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals blog - http://www.txccablog.com/
Rita lawyer cites Libby contrasts
11 Jul 2007, 8:20 am
" Cochran argued the case of Rita v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Lack of Cell Phone Reimbursement Creates Class Action Liability for CA Employers
18 Aug 2014, 1:09 pm by Remy Kessler
  In Cochran v. [read post]
Employment Law Watch - http://www.employmentlawwatch.com/
Statute of Limitations Applicable to Claims Brought Under the Governmental Immunity Act
15 Mar 2010, 7:35 pm by David M. McLain
In Cochran v. [read post]
Colorado Construction Litigation - http://hhmrlaw.blogspot.com/
when is a law firm "national"? hub-and-spoke firm finds out
14 Feb 2017, 8:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cochran Firm, P.C. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/