Search for: "Persons v. United Parcel Serv., Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 3:13 pm
Largely due to the unique enforcement role played by the EEOC, a federal district court in Illinois ruled that it should not have dismissed the EEOC’s amended complaint alleging class claims that UPS violated the ADA via an inflexible leave policy that did not provide for reasonable accommodations (EEOC v United Parcel Serv, Inc, NDIll, January 11, 2013). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 7:31 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
(United Transportation Union v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
United Parcel Serv., Inc., 665 F.3d 68, 73 (3d Cir. 2012).Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH at *12.Jury InstructionsYou may make an adverse inference in this case against Glenmark. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 4:01 am
United Parcel Serv., Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 5:44 am
(hereinafter the B & H law firm), to represent him in the prosecution of an action to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained in March 2005 while working for United Parcel Service due to an allegedly defective condition on a loading dock in Brooklyn. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 7:56 am
Bur., Inc. v United Parcel Serv., Inc., 35 AD3d 817). [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 pm
Step by Step, Inc. v City of Ogdensburg, 2016 WL 1319081 (NDNY 4/5/2016) Filed under: ADA, Current Caselaw - New York, Fair Housing Act Amendments [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:36 am
Because the EEOC’s Sec. 12112(b)(6) claim was not premised on attendance but rather on the employer’s alleged 100-percent healed requirement, the 12-month policy could be considered an impermissible qualification standard and not an essential function, a federal district court in Illinois, denying the company’s motion to dismiss (EEOC v United Parcel Service, Inc, February 11, 2014, Ellis, S). 12-month leave policy. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:41 am
’” Id. at 11 (quoting Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm
Gaitis With the issuance of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:32 pm
[VDARE partly complied with the subpoena, but later sued] in United States District Court for the Northern District of New York … [VDARE Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc., 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)--K.K. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
[5] See Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Int., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 11:00 pm
See United Parcel Serv. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc.,[2] 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)· K.K. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:18 pm
United Parcel Serv., Inc., Case No. 1:09-cv-05291 (N.D. [read post]