Search for: "Peter Bright, Ars Technica"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Bright was well-known in tech circles for his coverage of Microsoft for Ars Technica, a tech blog owned by magazine publisher Conde Nast. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
Google isn’t the company that we should have handed the Web over to — Peter Bright of Ars Technica writes how Google’s dominance in the web browser market means it holds considerable sway over how the web operates. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 5:21 am
In this op-ed at Ars Technica, Peter Bright responds to critics of the proposal, writing, “Deprived of the ability to use browser plugins, protected content distributors are not, in general, switching to unprotected media. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 5:14 am
The Google/Oracle decision was bad for copyright and bad for software — Op-ed from Ars Technica Technology Editor Peter Bright argues that last week’s jury verdict that found that Google’s copying of elements of the Java platform was fair use “makes things worse, not better” for developers and the software industry. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Elsewhere, Peter Bright argues that software is about to suffer. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:40 am
Ars Technica (Peter Bright) reports that Microsoft’s Windows 10 will have “a new browser codenamed Spartan. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:16 am
This tweet sparked legal proceedings which Ars Technica tried to describe recently: That brings us to today. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:47 pm
Over at Ars Technica, Peter Bright points out: A one-off payment of $529 is hard to stomach. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 7:19 am
Second, in an article on Ars Technica, Peter Bright takes a serious look at the upcoming DRM on Windows 7 and finds that it isn’t nearly as bad as people actually think it is. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly –… [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:10 pm
Although it expressly declined to impose a bright-line rule, it held that "few awards exceeding a single-digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages . . . will satisfy due process. [read post]
