Search for: "Peter Georg Picht"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2017, 8:45 am
Quinney College of Law and Peter Georg Picht University of Zurich - Institute of Law; Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition offer Patent Assertion Entities and Legal Exceptionalism in Europe and... [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 5:45 am
Peter Georg Picht, LL.M. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:15 pm
Picht, Peter Georg and Loderer, Gaspare, Framing Algorithms – Competition Law and (Other) Regulatory Tools (October 30, 2018). [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:32 pm
Peter Georg Picht and Prof. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 5:49 am
IPKat friends, Professor Peter Georg Picht, and PhD student Erik Habich, from the university of Zurich, share with us further insights on the German FRAND approach here. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:05 am
In this Part, three chapters seemed especially relevant to this Kat.Chapter 3, authored by Peter Georg Picht, discusses the possibilities for arbitration, offered by the Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC), established as part of the Unitary Patent’s system. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:43 am
Peter Picht (University of Zurich). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Professor Peter Georg Picht and Erik Habich (both Zurich University/Max Planck Institute), have kindly offered to provide a summary and first thoughts on the decision. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 10:41 am
To be fair, Zurich-based Professor Peter Picht is a gifted speaker who always has interesting information to share. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:47 am
Peter Georg Picht, LL.M., followed by a Q&A. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:38 am
Although the CJEU considers that IP addresses and email address do not fall within the notion of ‘address’, Eleonora disagrees with such interpretation, arguing that this results corresponds neither with the everyday meaning of the term, nor to the overarching objectives of the 2004/48/EC Directive.PatentsKat Friends Peter Georg Picht and Erik Habich provided their thoughts on the Sisvel v. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 8:54 pm
And yet, despite these critiques, most observers seem united in recognizing arbitration’s potential—so long as it is appropriately structured (see Peter Georg Picht and Gaspare Tazio Loderer, “Arbitration in SEP/FRAND Disputes: Overview and Core Issues,” Journal of International Arbitration, 36(5):575-594 (2019)). [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
One was authored by Professor Peter Georg Picht (Zurich and London) together with Professor Jorge Contreras (Utah), and the other by Professor Martin Stierle (Luxembourg) together with Professor Franz Hofmann (Erlangen-Nuremberg). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
After lunch, Prof Dr Peter Georg Picht addressed injunctions in the context of FRAND cases. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:31 am
First, SEP holders could rely on a relatively effective patent rights enforcement, even with regards to patents protected in countries where patent jurisdiction is not optimal (see Picht, Peter Georg & Loderer, Gaspare Tazio. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 5:32 am
IPKat friends, Professor Peter Georg Picht, and PhD student Erik Habich, from the university of Zurich, share with us further insights on the German FRAND approach. [read post]
