Search for: "Peter Goldstein"
Results 161 - 180
of 222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2010, 2:59 pm
On this point she cites the Tom Goldstein HuffPo piece I dissected here. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:00 am
German Constitutional Law and Doctrine on State of Emergency - Paradigms and Dilemmas of a Traditional (Continental) Discourse András Jakab , Pazmany Peter Catholic University Abstract The article examines the current German constitutional provisions and the different (historical and current) paradigms of German constitutional scholarship dealing with state of emergency. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:30 am
Or when Peter nominated his good friend Turkan for eviction, because she was home-sick. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am
Peter Landers at the Wall Street Journal’s Washington Wire blog highlights O’Connor’s description of the confirmation process as “a difficult, unpleasant experience. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog, represents the petitioners in the case, but the author of this post is not involved in the case.] [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:19 pm
.'"] The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (Adam Goldstein & Peter Bonilla) reports: [A]a new case involving Dr. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
(Lyle Denniston and Tom Goldstein both recapped the argument Wednesday on this blog.) [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Additional coverage of (and commentary on) the decision comes from Avik Roy, also of Forbes, Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick, James Vicini of Reuters (via the Chicago Tribune), Alexandra Malatesta of JURIST, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, and Peter Suderman at Reason. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
In a New York Times op-ed, Peter Decherney urges the Court to rule in favor of the petitioners, arguing that “access to a stable and growing public domain has been essential to innovation. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:21 pm
Goldstein, University of Pittsburgh Blanca Laffon, University A Coruna Edward B. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog, serves as counsel to the petitioners in Mohamad, but the author of this post is not involved in the case.] [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 11:49 am
(Katelyn Peters, Investopedia). [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
Reports come from Peter Landers at The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) and Chris Johnson at Washington Blade. [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
In those cases, the “tone,” as Yale law professor Abraham Goldstein once observed, “…has been less one of judicial restraint than of judicial withdrawal. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:07 am
Goldstein, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Tags: Beneficial owners, Corporate Transparency Act, Disclosure, Financial regulation, FinCEN, LLCs, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Transparency When a Company Takes a Stand, What is the Board’s Role? [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:04 pm
See Andreas Hüneke, Die faschistische Aktion "Entartete Kunst" 1937 in Halle (Staatliche Galerie Moritzburg Halle, 1987), p. 38, no. 42; and Peter Nisbet, ed., El Lissitzky 1890-1941, exh. cat., 1987, Proun inventory no. 14, p. 160. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents the petitioner in Florence.]. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents the petitioner in Florence.] [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:19 pm
Peters) concluded that neither the justices nor the reporter of the Supreme Court’s decisions had any protectible copyright in the opinions of the court. [read post]
