Search for: "Peter M. Shane"
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 8:15 am
Peters in The New York Times. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:57 pm
Strauss, Betts Professor of Law at Columbia School of Law; Peter M. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:04 am
Chronicle of Higher Education op-ed: The True Spirit of Law-School Reform, by Peter M. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was to have had a hearing today on proposed reforms to the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Peter M. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:30 am
Shane Harris has a fascinating piece on the rise of Admiral Timothy Dorsey. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
There are many stories, including Peter Finn’s at the Washington Post, Charlie Savage’s at the New York Times, Kevin Bogardus’s at The Hill, and Bill Chappell’s at NPR. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:12 pm
Shane. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:39 pm
Peter M. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:39 pm
Peter M. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:46 am
Now, you can hear the issue debated by two eminent legal scholars: Professor Peter M. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
Griffin has named Peter D. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:53 pm
Jackson The Economics of Digitization: An Agenda for NSF Shane M. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:46 am
I’m in the process of collecting and posting reviews of and commentary on Vice President Dick Cheney’s book that will be of interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW / SAMUEL M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW / SAMUEL M. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:15 am
And now Peter Shane, the separation of powers expert at Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, emails this in connection with my post: I’m wondering if your post doesn’t actually understate matters. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Krotoszynski, Jr., Peter M. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
Secunda, Jeffrey M. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
Peter Shane has a great question for GOP House members written as they prepared to read the Constitution aloud at the opening session of the new Congress (a stunt I’m entirely for, by the way — the Constitution should be read aloud much more often, I say).Peter argues, I think correctly, that the Incompatibility Clause of the Constitution (Section 6, Paragraph 2, of Article I: “no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a… [read post]
