Search for: "Peter Margulies"
Results 261 - 280
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
And last Monday, an amicus brief was filed by Peter Margulies and James Schoettler in support of the government, on behalf of a range of “former government officials, former military lawyers, and scholars of national security law. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
” Later, Peter Margulies considered the concurring opinion written by Judge Janice Rogers Brown and concluded that “judicial deference” to Congress’s power to codify and interpret international law is best. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
” Readers may see in such a conclusion (and in our post, more generally) a fair amount of tension with Jack’s “longer view” of al Bahlul from yesterday, and with today’s analysis by Peter Margulies with respect to Congress’s power to “define” international law. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies then examined the report’s treatment of human rights concerns. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:55 am
First, we featured an extended of back and forth between Peter Margulies (Part I and Part II) and Steve on the merits of Al Nashiri’s latest habeas petition. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:00 pm
It’s clear from his post this morning that my friend Peter Margulies believes that Al-Nashiri’s new habeas challenge to his trial by military commission, which rests on the claim that the United States was not involved in an armed conflict with al Qaeda at the time of his alleged crimes, is without merit. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
Abstracts, which should be no more than 1,000 words in length, should be submitted by August 15, 2014 to section chair Peter Margulies of Roger Williams University School of Law, pmargulies@rwu.edu. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies summarized some of the discussion at a recent Yale Information Society Project Symposium. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
And Peter Margulies posted about a FedSoc debate where he argued in favor of extraterritorial application of the ICCPR against Edwin Williamson against Nick Rostow. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
His criticisms invited an immediate response from Peter Margulies who defended the propriety of the drafting process. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:00 am
I want to take issue with Peter Margulies’s laudatory remarks this weekend about the Harold Koh memos on extraterritorial application of the ICCPR and the CAT—you know, those memos that mysteriously showed up in the New York Times just as the United States was preparing to present its views on the ICCPR to the UN panel that oversees the treaty. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:34 pm
Peter Margulies (Roger Williams University School of Law) has posted Evolving Relevance: The Metadata Program and the Delicate Balance of Secrecy, Deliberation, and National Security on SSRN. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:48 pm
Peter S. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies linked to an article he has written responding to critics of the 215 program who complain that FISC has interpreted the statute’s “relevance” standard overly broadly. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies defended 702 collection as consistent with international norms, and insisted that the American surveillance program actually contains greater safeguards than their European counterparts. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:36 am
Peter Margulies gave a harsher attack on the report, arguing that the Review Group vastly underestimated the efficacy of the bulk metadata collection program, failed to consider the potential for abuse in trusting this data to the private sector and ignored safeguards currently in place. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies and Ben each offered thoughts on the opinion this morning. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am
Clapper, I am largely, though not completely, in agreement with Peter Margulies’s assessment of the matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies explained that while the Report has a few good ideas, its more extreme solutions rely more heavily on “sloganeering” than on convincing analysis. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Peter Margulies thought the case did address the First Amendment issues in substantive manner and gave an explanation of why. [read post]
