Search for: "Peter S. Margulies"
Results 221 - 240
of 343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2015, 12:23 pm
The New York Times and the Washington Post report on Biden’s announcement, and Defense One’s Molly O’Toole reminds us of Biden’s influence in the Obama administration’s cautious approach to military force. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
Peter Margulies pushed back on Tim’s “suggestion that Congress drop the ‘conduct of the foreign affairs of the United States’ prong of the FISA Amendments Act (FAA),” arguing that such a measure fails to consider the cost of the proposed reform. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:02 am
In light of the rising chaos on the ground in Afghanistan, the Post’s Greg Jaffe provides today’s long read on President Obama’s fading hopes of bringing the troops home before he departs from the White House. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:15 am
A brief word in response to Peter Margulies’s point about the costs of my proposal to give up the use of PRISM for “foreign affairs” surveillance. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:21 am
Bobby, Peter Margulies, and Kenneth Anderson all posted their recollections of Mike. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:00 pm
The most sustained time I spent with Mike was at the same conference event that Peter Margulies was at — a televised mock trial on drones and targeted killing two years ago at Penn State. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 10:29 am
Bobby and Peter Margulies wrote on the passing of Professor Mike Lewis. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Peter Margulies disputed the Court’s decision to vacate the military commission conviction of Al Bahlul, arguing that the Court’s interpretation of Congress’s Article I authority over military commissions was too narrow. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:47 am
To similar effect is my friend Peter Margulies' post criticizing the majority and defending Judge Henderson's "pragmatic" analysis. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm
Peter Margulies discussed the D.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
United States (in which a divided panel held that Congress violated Article III when it authorized law-of-war military commissions to try wholly domestic offenses), and Peter Margulies' lenghty critique of the ruling reduce to an outwardly straightforward claim: that the central error of Judge Judith Rogers' opinion for the panel majority is its failure to properly heed the Supreme Court's precedents regarding non-Article III… [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies also took aim at the 2nd Circuit decision, arguing that the ruling doesn’t properly consider the government’s use restrictions on the metadata it collects. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:30 am
Peter Margulies joined the FISA discussion, arguing that the 2nd Circuit decision, to its detriment, overlooks the implications of government restrictions on the use of metadata. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies discussed how the opinion will shape the case going forward and argued that the judge’s opinion rightly censured the Obama administration for allowing “rhetoric to supplant reality. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:51 am
After a federal judge enjoined President Obama’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans immigration plan, Peter Margulies explored the district court’s opinion and how it will shape the debate over presidential power going forward. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Joseph Margulies is a Visiting Professor of Law and Government at Cornell University. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:00 am
On Tuesday, Peter Margulies looked at both the Majority and Minority’s claims over the efficacy of torture, arguing that ultimately, ruling out EIT’s is a “normative judgement,” and that judgement must be made while understanding the risks of the decision if it is to endure. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:26 am
Although there are too many examples of this approach to list (including the public comments from CIA Director Brennan), two paradigmatic cases have appeared here at Lawfare, in “Part I” of Ben’s “Thoughts on the SSCI Report,” posted on Monday, and Peter Margulies’ post from Tuesday on “Torturing Efficacy. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
Finally, Peter Margulies explained all that’s wrong in the ongoing debate about the efficacy of torture. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 5:59 am
Peter Margulies argued that President Obama’s action and the OLC’s unconvincing legal defense injured our constitutional framework. [read post]
