Search for: "Peter S. Margulies"
Results 241 - 260
of 343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
Disagreements about the significance of congressional silence are at the heart of pretty much every published critique of the President’s actions that we’ve read since Thursday—by Peter Margulies, Peter Schuck, David Martin, David Rivkin, and Elizabeth Price Foley. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:30 am
Peter Margulies has effectively shownhow the opinion ignored or mischaracterized the barriers and delays deliberately built into current law before a child’s citizenship can result in legal status for the parents. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:00 am
(Peter Margulies makes a similar point over at Lawfare.) 2. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies also examined the case and the fact that Quirin is still “very much alive. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:28 am
" Peter Margulies has this post today at the "Lawfare" blog. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
In light of both our prior exchange and my Just Security post from yesterday, I only have two new points to make in response to Peter Margulies’ post on yesterday’s D.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:27 am
(For an excellent overview of the issues, see the exchange between Steve Vladeck and Peter Margulies over at Lawfare, starting here and here.In Ex parte Quirin the Supreme Court recognized a limited exception to the constitutional requirement of trying crimes in Article III courts. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am
Lawfare was the scene of lively debate this week between Steve Vladeck and Peter Margulies over al Bahlul v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:11 pm
For the two people still following the exchange between me and Peter Margulies over the bottom-side briefing in the al Bahlul D.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm
I must confess that I don’t fully understand Peter Margulies’ response to my post from earlier today. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
And last Monday, an amicus brief was filed by Peter Margulies and James Schoettler in support of the government, on behalf of a range of “former government officials, former military lawyers, and scholars of national security law. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
” Later, Peter Margulies considered the concurring opinion written by Judge Janice Rogers Brown and concluded that “judicial deference” to Congress’s power to codify and interpret international law is best. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
” Readers may see in such a conclusion (and in our post, more generally) a fair amount of tension with Jack’s “longer view” of al Bahlul from yesterday, and with today’s analysis by Peter Margulies with respect to Congress’s power to “define” international law. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies then examined the report’s treatment of human rights concerns. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:55 am
First, we featured an extended of back and forth between Peter Margulies (Part I and Part II) and Steve on the merits of Al Nashiri’s latest habeas petition. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:00 pm
It’s clear from his post this morning that my friend Peter Margulies believes that Al-Nashiri’s new habeas challenge to his trial by military commission, which rests on the claim that the United States was not involved in an armed conflict with al Qaeda at the time of his alleged crimes, is without merit. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
Abstracts, which should be no more than 1,000 words in length, should be submitted by August 15, 2014 to section chair Peter Margulies of Roger Williams University School of Law, pmargulies@rwu.edu. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies summarized some of the discussion at a recent Yale Information Society Project Symposium. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
And Peter Margulies posted about a FedSoc debate where he argued in favor of extraterritorial application of the ICCPR against Edwin Williamson against Nick Rostow. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
His criticisms invited an immediate response from Peter Margulies who defended the propriety of the drafting process. [read post]
