Search for: "Peter S. Margulies"
Results 121 - 140
of 343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
Peter Margulies detailed the context for the orders and argued that the decision was not a judgment of the ban’s ultimate legality. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 8:51 am
Peter Margulies summarized oral arguments at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Hawaii v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:39 am
Peter S. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:50 am
Peter Margulies detailed the context for the Supreme Court’s travel ban orders. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 11:39 pm
Henderson, Patrick Keane & Josh Liddy, Remote and Autonomous Warfare Systems: Precautions in Attack and Individual Accountability Robin Geiß & Henning Lahmann, Autonomous Weapons Systems: A Paradigm Shift for the Law of Armed Conflict Peter Margulies, Making Autonomous Targeting Accountable: Command Responsibility for Computer-Guided Lethal Force in Armed Conflicts Michael W. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Joseph Margulies is a Professor of Law and Government at Cornell University. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
Peter Margulies argued the court was right to restrain the ban as a probable violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:07 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Peter Margulies argued that the Hawaii federal district court rightly blocked the implementation of the most recent travel ban on the basis that it violates the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:41 am
Peter Margulies on Lawfare writes: "On Tuesday, Judge Derrick Watson of the federal district court in Hawaii issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against President Donald Trump’s third executive order... [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:38 pm
As immigration law scholar Peter Margulies (who believes that Travel Ban 2.0 was legal) explains, the new order is actually more vulnerable to these statutory objections than the old one, because of its more sweeping nature. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am
Peter Margulies disagreed, arguing it undermined the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 2:32 pm
Russell Spivak summarized the president’s action, whose legality Josh Blackman defends and Peter Margulies questions. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:50 am
Peter Margulies argued that the travel ban proclamation undermines the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:44 pm
Peter Margulies has this commentary on Lawfare on Trump's latest travel ban. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:55 pm
Or, as Peter Margulies puts it (channeling Woody Allen), it is a “travesty of a mockery of a sham. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm
Peter Margulies points out that beyond constitutional doubts, there still may be statutory problems with the new proclamation: The policy amounts to nationality-based discrimination with respect to the issuance of visas in violation of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am
Wittes posted the “Boris and Natasha Buy a Facebook Ad” Edition of Rational Security: Peter Margulies first flagged and then discussed the Supreme Court’s stay on part of the Ninth Circuit’s order last week in the case against President Trump’s revised "travel ban. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith highlighted his essay in The Atlantic, “A Trump Damage Assessment” Peter Margulies flagged the Supreme Court’s stay on the Ninth Circuit’s order to admit refugees with assurance of sponsorship in the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am
Peter Margulies shared his thoughts on the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:31 pm
The contributors to the symposium include Eric Posner (University of Chicago), Asha Rangappa (Yale), Judith Resnik (Yale), Peter Margulies (Roger Williams), and others. [read post]
