Search for: "Peter Spiro" Results 1 - 20 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2021, 9:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Fourth, Peter Spiro is a law professor at Temple. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 6:34 am by Patricia Hughes
Called “unprecedented” by Emeritus Professor Peter Russell, this screening is based not only on religion, but also on perceived religion. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 8:36 am by Andrew Kent
In addition, in a brief filed nine months earlier in the criminal investigation concerning Vice President Spiro Agnew, Solicitor General Robert Bork had implied that a presidential self-pardon would be lawful. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:40 am by Tim Zinnecker
Potential candidates for either position are encouraged to contact committee co-chairs Peter Spiro and Kristen Murray at lawfsc@temple.edu. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
Peter Spiro reviewed Yael Tamir’s book, “Why Nationalism. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:04 am by Vishnu Kannan
Peter Spiro reviewed Yael Tamir’s book, “Why Nationalism. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:46 am
Spiro Katerina Linos, reviewing Is International Law International? [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:30 am by Jack Goldsmith
” Others, including Brian Kalt, Peter Shane, Tribe/Painter/Eisen, and Cass Sunstein, make similar arguments. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
Temple University’s Peter Spiro told the Post that Markle doesn’t get a pass due to her royal status. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:07 pm
The symposium includes an introduction by Jaya Ramji-Nogales and Peter J. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am by Lana Ulrich
In February 2017 We the People podcast featured a debate on the order between Peter Spiro and Anil Kalhan on this issue. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:45 am by Margo Schlanger
For over a quarter of a century, scholars have been calling on the Supreme Court to jettison the so-called plenary-power doctrine, or at least to disavow the strongest form of that doctrine, which, to quote a recent summary by Peter Spiro, “give[s] the political branches the judicial equivalent of a blank check to regulate immigration as they see fit. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:50 am by Elizabeth McElvein
Writing for the New York Times in December 2015, Peter Spiro argued that candidate Trump’s proposed religious-based immigration ban—although reprehensible—may pass constitutional muster because of the court’s history of extreme deference to the political branch on immigration. [read post]