Search for: "Peter Spiro" Results 121 - 140 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
And in an op-ed for the New York Times, Peter Spiro argues that the Court should uphold the law because “the problem [created by restrictive immigration laws] will largely self-correct,” but “judicial intervention risks generating its own backlash.” [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Exploring the Tension of First Amendment Religion Protections and Civil Rights Progress within the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, (The Legislation and Policy Brief, Forthcoming).Mohammad Fadel, Muslim Reformists, Female Citizenship and the Public Accommodation of Islam in Liberal Democracy, (Politics and Religion, Cambridge University Press, 2012).Jeff Redding, Beyond Exclusion: A Review of Peter J. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
Joseph Landau reviewed Peter Spiro’s book At Home in Two Countries and pondered the history of dual citizenship in the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:27 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Peter Spiro reviewed Michael Glennon and Robert Sloane’s book Foreign Affairs Federalism: The Myth of National Exclusivity. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 6:08 am by Quinta Jurecic
“Wet Foot/Dry Foot” policy on Cuban refugees, and Peter Spiro reviewed Michael Glennon and Robert Sloane’s new book, Foreign Affairs Federalism: The Myth of National Exclusivity. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 5:29 am by Scott Bomboy
Temple Law’s Peter Spiro, in a widely read New York Times op-ed piece, noted that Korematsu’s impact is the existence of a broad social stigma on race-based court decisions. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
Peter Spiro expressed optimism that courts would strike down the Trump administration’s refugee travel ban based on a set of unprecedented circumstances. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am by Jordan Brunner
   Peter Spiro expressed optimism that the courts would strike down the Trump administration’s refugee travel ban based on a set of unprecedented circumstances. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:28 pm
Liptak includes one example in his article: Peter J. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
Temple University’s Peter Spiro told the Post that Markle doesn’t get a pass due to her royal status. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
To get a sense of why some people worry — and rightly so, I think — about the use of foreign law in American constitutional decisionmaking, consider this passage from Professor Peter J. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
Peter Spiro reviewed Yael Tamir’s book, “Why Nationalism. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The Supreme Court's decision in the upcoming Arizona case looms large over the Alabama lawsuit and will likely influence the 11th Circuit ruling, says Peter Spiro, a law professor at Temple University. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by Richard Samp - Guest
There is much to be said for Peter Spiro’s suggestion that the Court may be reluctant to hear this case at all, so quickly on the heels of its immigration preemption decision last term in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:54 pm
Some defenders of the administration, such as legal scholar Peter Spiro, argue that the campaign against ISIS does not need congressional authorization because it is not a “real war,” primarily because the president assures us it will be limited to air strikes and probably won’t involve a risk of significant US casualties. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:45 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Jack Goldsmith, More on the UN Charter, Syria, and “Illegal but Legitimate” Ken Anderson, Five Fundamental International Law Approaches to the Legality of a Syria Intervention Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman on the President’s Syria Press Conference, and a Brief Response Jack Goldsmith, Two Important Implications from President’s Press Conference in Sweden Lauren Bateman, Recent Presidential Remarks on Syria Raffaela Wakeman, SFRC Approves Syria Authorization Language Jack… [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 11:58 am by Ingrid Wuerth
But in other preemption cases, the Court has emphasized the primacy of the federal government in foreign relations and applied what Peter Spiro has termed an “exceptional, hair-trigger preemption standard,” instead of the presumption against preemption that the Court generally applies. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
Peter Spiro, in predicting that the Court will deny certiorari, writes that “[m]embers of the Court can hardly be ignorant of the persistent failure of the federal government to enact comprehensive immigration reform, and there must also be an understanding of state frustration with the abdication of federal authority.” [read post]