Search for: "Peters v. Clarke" Results 61 - 80 of 308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
A high-profile week at the Leveson Inquiry, with evidence from Rebekah Brooks, the MailOnline editor Martin Clarke and Andy Coulson (see Natalie Peck’s Inforrm roundup). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am by Emma Lewis, Olswang LLP
Supreme Court The appeal was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge on 18 May 2015. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
Peter Swire and Richard Clarke disagreed, arguing that Congress should reform 702 to bring it in line with Fourth Amendment principles. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
Peter Preston agreed with her in The Observer. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 5:18 am by Victoria Clark
  Victoria Clark, Matthew Kahn, Mikhaila Fogel, Quinta Jurecic, and Benjamin Wittes offered their analysis of the latest twist in a L'Affaire Russe subplot: Peter Smith and the case of the 33,000 missing emails. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Asay ("This Article disaggregates open innovation communities and assesses the actual risks that patents pose to different categories of participants in open innovation communities.")Why Technology Customers Are Being Sued En Masse for Patent Infringement & What Can Be Done, by Colleen V. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for Wyoming will be a senior assistant state attorney general, Peter Kenneth Michael, of Cheyenne. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Peter Stewart v The Queen (Jamaica), heard 28 March 2011. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the schedule to annex 2-B[3] of the… [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
This is followed by an essay focussing on the potential impact of Carter’s application of the stare decisis doctrine in Canada (AG) v Bedford, 2013 SCC 72. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:54 am by Robert Tanha
Clark v Werden Peter Clark, James Werden and John Muller were once business associates, but Clark and Werden had a falling out. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
Peter Stewart v The Queen (Jamaica), heard 28 March 2011. [read post]