Search for: "Peters v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 6:37 am
The post MÉLANGE DAVIS v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:03 am
Nazareth, Annette Nazareth, Betsy Donovan, Biglaw, Chief Marketing Officers, David Fries, Davis Polk, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Federal Government, Federal Trade Commission, Fried Frank, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson, FTC, FTC v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:09 am
Peters, et al., Judge Michael Davis allowed to stand a lawsuit concerning the bridge near Oak Park Heights that would cross the Lower St. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:54 am
This is what Professor Peter Lee (UC Davis) argues in his forthcoming article, The Accession Insight and Patent Infringement Remedies, which I had the opportunity to hear him discuss last month at Fordham Law. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 12:31 pm
It's been a busy week for Judge Leonard Davis in Tyler. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
Ryan was the "shot-caller".Pursuant to Johnson's plan, Alvarez and Baker-Riley show up at the home of Peter Davis, who had a fair amount of marijuana at the place. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am
However, the day after its approval, this ordinance was stopped in court by a lawsuit led by Peter Schey and known as League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:23 pm
Davis rememberedRIP Judge Peter Palermo, Judge Shelby HighsmithAnd the most popular post of the year was this because of the search terms in the title.See you next year. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:41 am
In Davies v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:43 am
Bainbridge Democracy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
Quoting its 1978 opinion in TVA v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Davis, a municipal bond case. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Davis v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Four years ago, in Davis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
Davis, Alexandra J. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:00 am
A central thesis of this chapter is that it is questionable whether the reasoning of Dixon J in the Cold War Era cases (Sharkey, Burns v Ransley, Communisty Party Case, and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Case) as well as the reasoning in subsequent pivotal executive power cases in the High Court such as AAP and Davis, support the development of an inherent executive “nationhood” power in s 61 of the Constitution. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 1:48 pm
The case is not like Davis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 6:00 pm
Peter S. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Peter M. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:05 pm
Study of Type I, Type II error finds FDA much too conservative in drug approval [Vahid Montazerhodjat and Andrew Lo via Tabarrok] Behind push to license/regulate personal trainers in Washington, DC and elsewhere: ACA opened spigot of publicly channeled wellness money [Aaron Davis/Washington Post via Tyler Cowen, Peter Suderman] “Medical lending”: financiers “invest in operations to remove pelvic implants, [reap] payouts when cases settle” [Alison Frankel… [read post]
