Search for: "Peters v. Johns"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,741
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
Sources, Characteristics and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Harbut, Peter Infante, William E. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2024 The thirteen consistory court judgments circulated in April included: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs Fonts Also included are: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
[With thanks to Peter Edge.] [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account approval… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
Professor Mansfield was the John H. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
Charles Bertini v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:45 am
U.S. and Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
From an amicus brief in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:54 am
Donohue, Esq., and John F. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Mary Sledmere [2007] Peter Collier Ch. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:23 am
Pfizer v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts last June in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Smotherman, Reading Between the Wines: Granholm v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Johns, 874 F.2d 1447 (11th Cir. 1989). [read post]
