Search for: "Peters v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm by Cindy Cohn
Congress stopped the mass telephone records program in 2015 as part of the USA Freedom Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:03 am by Linda O'Brien (CCH)
Thus, the Board’s decision that the challenged claims of the patent were unpatentable was affirmed (Ethicon LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in USA Today on the strikingly absolutist language being used by Democratic leaders in defining the right to abortion after the Supreme Court’s leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
The Federal Circuit held, however, that AAPA can be permissible in assessing whether the patent’s claims would have been obvious in an inter partes review proceeding as an admission in a patent’s specification, and remanded to the Board on that issue (Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
The US Government has succeeded in its appeal against the decision not to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (USA v Julian Assange [2021] EWHC 3313 (Admin)). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:59 pm
A business and human rights framework treaty: Contours and challengesPanellists include Prof Peter Muchlinski (SOAS, University of London), Dr Eva Jueptner (University of Dundee), Dr Alex Ansong (Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration), Prof Dr Markus Krajewski (FAU, Germany), Dr Nicholas Bueno (UniDistance Suisse, Switzerland), Prof. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 4:25 pm by Juvan Bonni
 Peter Lee: Patent Law’s Externality Asymmetry (Source: SSRN) Prof. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the schedule to annex 2-B[3] of the… [read post]