Search for: "Petersen v. Petersen"
Results 81 - 100
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2014, 11:44 am
In Landers v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:11 am
In Holaway v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
Petersen v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:52 am
The court also took issue with the lower court making credibility determinations on summary judgment (Kauffman v Petersen Health Care VII, LLC dba Mason Point, October 16, 2014, Posner, R). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 1:18 pm
Petersen. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The 1709 Blog carries the results of the black-crested macaque selfie sidebar poll, which turned out to less exciting than some of us had hoped, on account of so many people agreeing that no copyright existed at all in works created by animals [this Kat wonders whether this might be another nail in the much-cited dictum of Petersen J in University of London Press Limited v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch. 601 that "what is worth copying is prima facie… [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:52 am
V. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 10:00 am
In fact, in the case of Webb v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Petersen Publ'g Co. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:35 am
In Dilts v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:50 am
., v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 8:00 am
Petersen v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am
Stewart and Kyle Petersen On January 10, 2013, U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:26 am
By Travis Anderson and Shannon Petersen In Flores v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
Travelling expenses are an integral part of necessary treatment and as such are a benefit subject to deduction: Petersen v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
Travelling expenses are an integral part of necessary treatment and as such are a benefit subject to deduction: Petersen v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:25 am
Authored by Kyle Petersen Last year, we reported on the defense verdict in the Henry v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:23 am
Further, while it appears that the court in Petersen implicitly distinguished Olympic Club v. [read post]
