Search for: "Petition of Famous Brands, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2009, 10:21 am
S&K Famous Brands., Inc., doing business as S & K Menswear, filed a Chapter 11 petition today. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 3:22 am
Jack Daniel's states the "questions presented" as follow:QUESTIONS PRESENTEDRespondent VIP Products LLC markets and sells dog toys that trade on the brand recognition of famous companies such as petitioner Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
For example, the famous brand Xerox is currently battling genericide. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 3:34 am
Heaven Hill Distilleries, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
Bayer twice amended its petition to cancel, adding claims under the famous mark provision (Article 6bis of the Paris Convention) and under Section 14(3), which permits cancellation of a registered mark that is used to misrepresent source. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 5:54 am
Caterpillar, Inc. filed a petition for cancellation with the USPTO on August 3rd, 2018, citing both a likelihood of confusion and dilution; they asserted in paragraph 6 that “the CAT mark has become a household name and is famous. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s decision is a big win for famous brand owners. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Co., Inc., 703 F.2d 1372, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:17 pm
Trademarks identify brands in a market. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
" [quoting Electronic Design & Sales Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 3:15 am
Innocor, Inc. , Cancellation No. 92054201 (November 13, 2015) [not precedential].Petitioner got out of the wrong side of the bed when it failed to get its registration into the record. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:38 am
Nautica Apparel, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 2:58 am
" Citigroup Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
Under Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
Under Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
” Otto Int’l Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
The Board found opposer’s marks to be famous based on billions of dollars in sales, significant market share, huge advertising expenditures, extensive media exposure, impressive brand awareness, and consistent high ranking by Business Week. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:29 am
Pharma 101, LLC, Cancellation No. 92068970 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark ESTRATEST for "male and female hormone tablet" on the ground of abandonment]. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
Fairmont Holdings, Inc., Cancellation No. 92057240 (January 3, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Francie R. [read post]
