Search for: "Petrocelli v. Baker" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2019, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since the defendants made a prima facie showing that the storm in progress rule applied to the underlying action, the burden shifted to the plaintiff to show that something other than the precipitation from the storm in progress caused the accident (see Baker v St. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
If a storm is ongoing, and a property owner elects to remove snow, the owner must do so with reasonable care or it could be held liable for creating a hazardous condition or exacerbating a natural hazard created by the storm (see Kantor v Leisure Glen Homeowners Assn., Inc., 95 AD3d 1177; Petrocelli v Marrelli Dev. [read post]