Search for: "Petry v. Petry"
Results 1 - 20
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2008, 7:13 pm
Justice Smith, in Petrie v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 11:51 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 11:05 am
Petrie, No. 261 EDA 2020 (Pa. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 5:21 pm
., School Bd. of Nassau, Fl. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:00 am
Meyers v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
But, as for congressional action, Ali argued for an update to the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which the Supreme Court invalidated in its seminal 1997 City of Boerne v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:32 pm
Questions Please contact Holly Fernandez Lynch, Executive Director, Petrie-Flom Center, with any questions: hlynch@law.harvard.edu, 617.384.5475. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:33 am
Vanwinkle v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 10:13 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 10:57 am
The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics will be hosting a conference entitled, “King v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:30 am
Petrie, No. 261 EDA 2020 (Pa. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:54 am
Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
Supreme Court landmark case of Roper v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
It has particularly impacted access to sexual and reproductive health goods and services—not only in the U.S., as discussed in Reproductive Rights in 2020: June Medical Services v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:44 am
Lipper recently had this post at the "Bill of Health" blog of Harvard Law's Petrie-Flom Center. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:46 am
Consider the increased value of Myriad’s database of variances of unknown significance after the Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:43 pm
Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:01 am
By Lane V. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
This is yet another one of the plethora of published opinions that splits as to whether or not Dueñas was correctly decided and whether trial courts have to determine ability to pay before they grant restitution orders. [read post]
