Search for: "Pettie v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2014, 1:59 pm
v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:37 am
In any event, the Superior Court dismissed Mr. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The Court in Ballew v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
The 2001 Act only allowed for penalty of IR£500 or 6 months for failure to disclose passwords and as far as we are aware these penalties were never imposed.The Superior Courts in Ireland have on occasion in recent years issued Anton Pillar Orders and other civil warrants which required individuals to disclose passwords to representatives of Civil plaintiffs, under threat of being held in contempt and summarily jailed. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
Nixon, 2005 BCCA 601 (also see the Superior Court decision).In the recently released decision in Rocha v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 4:55 pm
Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497.) [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:11 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:07 pm
In a decision last month from the Supreme Court of Canada, Dore v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:51 am
Quebec’s Superior Court and Court of Appeal upheld the suspension. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
The obvious advantage is that there is less burden on the courts to deal with petty matters which often permeate the Magistrates courts and which could be dealt with by mediation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
The obvious advantage is that there is less burden on the courts to deal with petty matters which often permeate the Magistrates courts and which could be dealt with by mediation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The obvious advantage is that there is less burden on the courts to deal with petty matters which often permeate the Magistrates courts and which could be dealt with by mediation. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:05 am
In contrast, a history of a series of petty offenses by the individual may have a cumulative impact in the determining the appropriate penalty to be imposed. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:24 am
Plaintiff established only "a litany of petty insults, vindictive behavior, and angry recriminations" that are not actionable. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:50 pm
The Superior Court’s opinion clarifies that an employee’s off-duty conduct must have a non-speculative impact on the employer’s business in order to constitute “just cause” for termination.A Hairy SituationThe case of Michael Christopher Designs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:29 pm
All adult indictable offenses will be heard in the Monmouth County Superior Court - Criminal Part. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:29 pm
All adult indictable offenses will be heard in the Monmouth County Superior Court - Criminal Part. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:06 am
As the Navy-Marine Corps Court has helpfully summarized: Our superior court has noted that “Articles 92 and 86(1) of the Code may overlap in certain situations involving reporting for military duty. [read post]
