Search for: "Petties v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2020, 10:49 pm by Firemark Law Team
Bolton [USDC for the District of Columbia]PSA: SETTLEMENT FOR MUSICIANS PABLO STAR V. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm by Garrett West
DC (Wilkins [concurring in judgment], Rao, Childs):  Appellant alleges that the District of Columbia violated the First and Fifth Amendment by selectively enforcing a defacement ordinance against its members. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm by Garrett West
DC (Wilkins [concurring in judgment], Rao, Childs):  Appellant alleges that the District of Columbia violated the First and Fifth Amendment by selectively enforcing a defacement ordinance against its members. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Collateral Consequences as a Consideration in the Right to a Jury Trial Calculation On June 21, 2018 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals sitting en banc rendered a decision inJean-Baptiste Bado v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Collateral Consequences as a Consideration in the Right to a Jury Trial Calculation On June 21, 2018 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals sitting en banc rendered a decision inJean-Baptiste Bado v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Today, twenty-three states and the District of Columbia currently have laws legalizing marijuana for either medical or recreational use. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
Bush appointee to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am by admin
In 2010, the District of Columbia district court upheld the statute, but it was appealed a few weeks ago. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:29 am by Patrick Quinlan
  Section 5 then prohibited those jurisdictions from implementing any change affecting voting practices or procedures without preapproval from the United States Attorney General or the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that the change had no discriminatory purpose or effect. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
SaywellColonial Justice: Justice, Morality and Crime in the Niagara District, 1791-1849 by David MurrayCanadian State Trials Volume Two: Rebellion and Invasion in the Canadas, 1837-8 edited by F. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Searle & Co., 567 A.2d 398, 400-01 (Del. 1989).District of Columbia: Mampe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-5288, Pettis v. [read post]