Search for: "Petty v. State of Md"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2013, 9:16 am
LEXIS 167347, Nov. 4, 2013), and held that a suit in which an inmate alleged he had been improperly removed from a faith-based dormitory and retaliated against for grieving the incident was properly removed from state to federal court, despite plaintiff's state law allegations.In Petty v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 10:03 pm
MOSLEY, 423 U.S. 96 (1975) AND UNITED STATES v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:33 am
Lazevnick, 25, of Waldorf, MD. the co-pilot, Radioman 2nd Class Albert B. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 9:00 pm
Md. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:36 pm
Lazevnick, 25, of Waldorf, MD. the co-pilot, Radioman 2nd Class Albert B. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:36 pm
Lazevnick, 25, of Waldorf, MD. the co-pilot, Radioman 2nd Class Albert B. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
Lazevnick, 25, of Waldorf, MD. the co-pilot, Radioman 2nd Class Albert B. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 8:04 am
[iv] Md. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
From State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Levy-Gray, 894 A.2d 563, 577 (Md. 2006); Nolan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
