Search for: "Pfizer, Incorporated" Results 101 - 120 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Pfizer Inc., 249 F.R.D. 248, 254-55 (E.D. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:15 am by Mike Mireles
  Some research points to two causes of the high cost in the United States: 1) high pharmaceutical cost; and 2) high wages for health care workers.Notably, two pharmaceutical companies, Novartis and Pfizer, recently announced that they would not implement pharmaceutical price increases on certain drugs. [read post]
  For contracts already in existence on October 15, 2021, where performance is ongoing, the requirements must be incorporated when an extension is made or an option is exercised. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 8:26 pm by Ron Friedmann
 We also have big deals with some large law departments; for example, we are the primary managed document review provider to Pfizer. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:32 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
’ Updating the text Each year, all the relevant new materials are studied by the team and incorporated in the new edition. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (The Invent Blog), Impressive work on history of ‘Happy Birthday’ and copyright protection: (Innovationpartners), Gender and copyright: (Patry Copyright Blog)   Events 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - New York: (Patent Docs), 1-2 July – C5 conference on intellectual asset management for high-tech industries – Paris: (c5-online.com), 2… [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:41 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
DOJ, because Pfizer marketed Geodon for “off-label” uses [See https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/pae/News/2009/sep/pfizerrelease.pdf )] CHIROPRACTIC TREATMENT ■ 88 Cal. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 11:23 am
Specific performance against the buyer was rarely incorporated into acquisition agreements, not to mention the absence of any bank willing to agree to specific performance with respect to its obligations. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
By Hal WegnerBefore an overflow hearing room on an internationally available web broadcast, Chairman Howard Berman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee relevant to patents hosted a most informative and candid hearing yesterday afternoon joined by roughly ten of his committee colleagues, including Rep. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:36 pm by Peter J. Brown and Alexander Volberding
The FDA says that this information is typically conveyed in a patient fact sheet that is provided at the time of the vaccine administration…[5] As the EEOC guidance mentioned, one of the statutory requirements for drugs approved under the EUA process is that the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) ensure that recipients of the vaccine are informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing… [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Thus, in this setting, it makes abundant sense to allow a State that chooses to incorporate a federal standard into its law of torts to allow that standard to apply when the federal agency itself determines that fraud marred the regulatory-approval process.385 F.3d at 965-66 (a bunch of Buckman citations omitted) (emphasis added).The Second Circuit in Desiano did not agree. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Last week the New Jersey Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision (6-0) ordered a nationwide third-party payer class action decertified. [read post]