Search for: "Pfizer Inc. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Pfizer Inc., 446 F. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2009 WL 214649 (2d Cir. 2009). [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:11 am
The technology at issue, amlodipine besylate tablets, is commercially sold in the United States by Pfizer under the trademark Norvasc ®. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:19 am
Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Pfizer, which the United States declined to intervene in and was independently litigated by the relators. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:40 pm
In Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:16 am
The case is Barton v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2010 WL 163583, slip op. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
From the November 24 Bloomberg article: Pfizer Inc. doesn’t deserve a new trial in a Nevada case over the company’s menopause drugs and must pay a $57.6 million jury award to three women who alleged the pills caused their cancers, the state’s highest court ruled. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
See Pfizer Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:43 am
Now enter the Federal Circuit's recent ruling in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 7:11 am
Pfizer: Adoption and the FMLA The decision is Dotson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
In Pfizer v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Pfizer, Inc., No. 2013-1056 (Fed. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently weighed in on the scope of the United States Supreme Court’s influential opinion in Stern v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
At the DIDA site, under Document Sources, you can read about some of those drug company lawsuits, in particular: United States of America ex rel. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]
