Search for: "Pfizer Inc. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2007, 8:11 am
The technology at issue, amlodipine besylate tablets, is commercially sold in the United States by Pfizer under the trademark Norvasc ®. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Ben Vernia
Pfizer, which the United States declined to intervene in and was independently litigated by the relators. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:43 am by Gene Quinn
Recently, a group of amici led by Eli Lilly filed an amici curiae brief with the United States Supreme Court in the matter of Sequenom, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm by Tom Lamb
From the November 24 Bloomberg article: Pfizer Inc. doesn’t deserve a new trial in a Nevada case over the company’s menopause drugs and must pay a $57.6 million jury award to three women who alleged the pills caused their cancers, the state’s highest court ruled. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:43 am
Now enter the Federal Circuit's recent ruling in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently weighed in on the scope of the United States Supreme Court’s influential opinion in Stern v. [read post]