Search for: "Philadelphia v. Price"
Results 1 - 20
of 330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
Similarly, price-conscious consumers likely stockpiled beverages before the tax went into effect. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 5:46 pm
City of Richmond v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 5:46 pm
City of Richmond v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:38 pm
Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled June 14 in two separate opinions. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
Sometimes the price of putting public duty in first place is high. [read post]
Philadelphia’s BRT Encounters a Provision That Bars Solving the Problem that the Provision Created
24 Mar 2014, 5:01 am
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:01 am
Now the price must be paid. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:01 am
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:35 pm
Behrend v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:56 pm
”AAI’s brief in ZF Meritor LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:01 am
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:34 pm
Court of Appeals in Philadelphia has reversed a judgment in favor of the complaining distributor on its price discrimination claims against food manufacturer Michael Foods, Inc. and favored food service management company Sodexo, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
In the case of J.D. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:01 am
Philadelphia builders claim that they have tried to purchase the properties from Rappaport’s estate, but that Basciano wants them to “charge New York prices for Philadelphia lots. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:07 am
The district court’s judgment in favor of Uber and against the drivers, the Philadelphia Taxi Association, and more than 80 individual taxicab companies was affirmed (Philadelphia Taxi Association, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:43 am
Los 13 Abogados Litigantes de Dougherty, Leventhal & Price, L.L.P. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:12 am
Because the model cannot bridge the differences between supra-competitive prices in general and supracompetitive prices attributable to overbuilder deterrence, Rule 23(b)(3) cannot authorize treating subscribers in the Philadelphia cluster as members of a single class. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:26 pm
The decision is Behrend v. [read post]
