Search for: "Philip Morris USA Inc" Results 121 - 140 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
   There also appears to be a new relist in Philip Morris USA Inc v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Among cases the Justices considered at their private Conference last Friday on which they took no action Monday, the most significant were a major new class action case, involving constitutional challenges to a state class-action lawsuit in Louisiana against major tobacco companies (Philips Morris USA, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Supreme Court is expected to announce whether cert. will be granted in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
§ 1140, permits an employer to discharge an employee for making unsolicited internal complaints regarding violations of the statute.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the American Association of Retired PersonsPetitioner's reply Title: Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by South Florida Lawyers
"We believe the trial courts have used trial plans that are so fundamentally unfair they violate due process and Florida law," said Murray Garnick of Altria Client Services, which represents Altria Group Inc. subsidiary Philip Morris USA. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:47 am by John P. Ahlers
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 344 F.3d 753, 760 (8th Cir. 2003) ("A certain amount of speculation is necessary, an even greater amount is permissible (and goes to the weight of the testimony), but too much is fatal to admission. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:28 pm by Conor McEvily
petition of the day is: Title: Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
British American Tobacco defeats trade mark challenge in the Commonwealth Caribbean: Philip Morris Products S.A. v British American Tobacco (Brands) Limited (jiplp) Brazil Can we feed the hungry on statistics? [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
  And in cases where punitive damages are sought, consolidation of multiple plaintiffs into one trial is, in our view, a per se violation of Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:56 am by Bexis
”  Id. at *7 (quoting Davis, with our emphasis).Reliance, not causation.In fact, subsequent decisions have criticized whether Davis gave “fair consideration” to the causation element of FDUTPA (including a case we worked on, Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]