Search for: "Phillips v. Jacobs" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Vitulli “breached a duty owed to the shareholder independent of any duty owing to the corporation wronged” (Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951, 953; see Kramer v Meridian Capital Group, LLC, 201 AD3d 909, 911; Jacobs v Cartalemi, 156 AD3d 605, 608; Patterson v Calogero, 150 AD3d 1131, 1133). [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:15 am by Stephen Mayeaux
The Casta Paintings, created during the reign of Phillip V (1700-1740), reflect Mexican anxieties about miscegenation, and are contemporaries to Zabala’s request. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
The most time-sensitive among those cases is Trump v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Jacob Rodriguez at 9News.com. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
"infringes") irrespective of the patent's validity unless and until the patent is finally declared invalid (see Jacob LJ in Celltech v Medimmune [2004] EWCA Civ 1331). [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Daily Wire, Jacob Airey interviews the baker, Jack Phillips, and his counsel about “the build-up to the case, the outcome, and what it means for religious freedom. [read post]