Search for: "Phillips v. Kerr" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:18 am by Catherine Rose
Catherine is a paralegal at David Phillips & Partners, working in criminal defence. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
By a slim 4:3 majority (Lady Hale and Lords Phillips and Kerr dissenting), the Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal by finding that the claims of the servicemen should not be allowed to proceed on the basis that they were time-barred. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
By a slim 4:3 majority (Lady Hale and Lords Phillips and Kerr dissenting), the Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal by finding that the claims of the servicemen should not be allowed to proceed on the basis that they were time-barred. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
In the Supreme Court the majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) preferred a broader construction than the minority (Lord Judge, Lord Brown, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker) would have adopted. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
The case of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others will be heard from Wednesday 13 to Thursday 14 April 2011, also by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
Lord Kerr’s answer to both questions was a firm no. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
The appeals were heard by a seven justice panel of Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am by Chris Stott, Pannone LLP
On 5th May, a seven Justice Supreme Court, comprising Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and, reflecting, coincidentally, the changes confirmed earlier this week, Lord Collins (who will shortly retire) and Lord Justice Wilson (who, on this occasion will sit as an acting Justice but who will be sworn in as a full time Justice on 26th May), will consider this issue in the case of R v Waya [2010] EWCA Crim 412. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Wednesday 1 February 2012 in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Walker, L Hale, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr and L Dyson) over two days is the appeal of Assange v The Swedish Judicial Authority. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
" [speaking of Phillips v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 12:37 pm
empress_of_sytheria - Mercedes McCombZenferret - Michael Simon, FLInnosed - Bonnie LangHoney - Meghan RadickCookie - Donna Underwood - ALMoseyanme - Christine Keens - Alexandria, VAWinryRockbell - Rebecca Jackson KennedyInterpid Reporter - Jill Phillips - GASummer Breeze - Judy H. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Grace Capel
The reasoning of the majority (Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson) The majority noted that the Extradition Act 2003, a piece of domestic legislation, was passed in order to give effect to the EU Framework Decision on European Arrest Warrants. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
Ms Phillips, in turn, relied on the “exception” to PSI in section 72. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Commenter Richard Riley brings up an interesting point I haven’t seen mentioned before: Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Cruzan v. [read post]