Search for: "Phillips v. Kerr" Results 81 - 100 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Indeed, though Lord Kerr recognises (at [112]) that Pupino has stronger ‘injunctive force’, their Lordships indicate with varying degrees of certainty that, without Pupino, ‘the general presumption that the UK legislates in compliance with international obligations would produce the same result’ (at [98], per Lord Brown; see also [10], per Lord Phillips PSC, [112], per Lord Kerr and [121]-[122], per Lord Dyson). [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am by SHG
Garner (Mar. 21, 2016) • Scott Greenfield (Mar. 15, 2016) • Harvard Law Review (Apr. 1, 2016) • Orin Kerr (Mar. 31, 2016) • Charles Lane (Apr. 9, 2016) • Don Willett (Dec. 18, 2016) • Yale Law Journal (Apr. 1, 2016) Books Recommended by our respectable authorities — Femi Cadmus, Lee Epstein, Cedric Merlin Powell, and Susan Phillips Read. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  The starting point for the majority (Lords Phillips, Brown, Collins, Kerr and Dyson) was that every wrong should have a remedy, unless it was in the public interest to grant immunity: whilst the minority (Lord Hope and Lady Hale) were concerned of the chilling effect that abolishing immunity might have, and felt that such a fundamental rule change should be left to Parliament, the majority were undeterred by such considerations, pointing to the fact that since Hall… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
Lady Hale at §207 and Lord Kerr at §248) they also approved his formulation. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am by Charon QC
  The United Kingdom Supreme Court judgment authorising Assange’s  extradition to Sweden Carl Gardner: Lord Kerr on the Assange case Carl Gardner: Supreme Court judgment: Assange v Swedish Judicial Authority Carl Gardner: Could Assange apply to set aside the Supreme Court judgment? [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am by charonqc
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]