Search for: "Phillips v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Phillips. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am
Previously, and relying on the Court’s opinion in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 9:16 pm
O'Brien v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 10:34 am
LP v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:43 am
The court also held that the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) were met. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm
App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Dec. 3, 2019) The defendant was charged with impaired driving, was convicted in district court, appealed to superior court, and prevailed on a motion to suppress at a pretrial hearing in superior court. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:17 am
On 6 August a lawsuit was commenced in Los Angeles County Superior Court challenging SB 826 ( Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:34 am
But hold it, if it does not have that effect, doesn't that mean that one Superior Court Judge can overrule another? [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:13 am
Where we are molded and we become defined as something new and different and far superior. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
Phillip. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
In the recent Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decision in R. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
At the same time, in Eba v Advocate General for Scotland the Supreme Court decided an identical issue in relation to the Upper Tribunal in Scotland and the Scottish High Court of Justiciary. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
Superior Court of San Diego County/Hohnbaum, et al. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:18 pm
Craig Allen, 39 years old, and Phillip Walters, 56 years old, are facing criminal charges and surrendered at the California Superior Court upon the issuance of arrest warrants, DUI attorneys and the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
The Divisional Court ordered that the following two questions be tried as preliminary issues: first, whether the designation of the Upper Tribunal as a “superior court of record” of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 3(5) meant that its decisions were not amenable to the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court; and, secondly, whether the decision which Mr Cart sought to challenge was amenable to judicial review. [read post]
30 May 2016, 6:34 pm
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:13 am
Where we are molded and we become defined as something new and different and far superior. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:25 pm
” (Naturist Action Committee v. [read post]
