Search for: "Picking v. STATE FINANCE CORPORATION" Results 61 - 80 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2017, 2:45 pm by Morgan Weiland
When creating the commercial speech doctrine in the 1970s, beginning with Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
I decided to avoid that trap by trading my corporate ownership for the capitalized present value of the company’s earnings stream, which was taxable at lower capital gains rates. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:33 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
In a press release issued today, attorneys for a husband and wife tax fraud whistleblowers, expressed optimism that President Trump’s pick for Secretary of Treasury Steve Mnuchin would show support for the IRS Whistleblower Office by not appealing a the Tax Court’s decision in Whistleblower 21276-13W v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm by Frank Pasquale
To get a sense of how rural Democrats used to relate to voters, one need only pick up an old flyer from the [Wright] Patman archives in Texas: “Here Is What Our Democratic Party Has Given Us” was the title. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
Practice interview…my first one out of college so I picked a field I didn’t care to be in! [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm by Carl Vennitti
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:10 am by Lyle Denniston
From violent video games and films to funeral protests to soldiers claiming medals they never received to corporationsfinancing election campaigns, this court has seen wide varieties of expression that it has been eager to protect from government regulation or censorship. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  The story was subsequently picked up by the Independent and the Daily Mirror. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
United States, SCOTUS Blog (Nov. 14, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states/. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 9:18 am
Working through an interpreter, I was asked to give a brief description of campaign finance law in the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:18 am
This week, however, the FCC's bad news was followed very quickly by the Supreme Court's decision today in McCutcheon v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am by Peter Mahler
Indeed, the very definition of Promote states that it is “determined under Sections 6.1 (a)(iii)-(v). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am by Cicely Wilson
The court held that classifications based on sexual orientation were subject to a heightened scrutiny under United States v. [read post]