Search for: "Pickle v. Pickle" Results 1 - 20 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm by NL
Mr Pickles will now have to consider primary legislation to accomplish his stated end. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm by NL
Mr Pickles will now have to consider primary legislation to accomplish his stated end. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by J
We noted round 1 of Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State back in November (see our note here) in which the High Court found that Mr Pickles could not abolish Regional Strategies (e.g. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by J
We noted round 1 of Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State back in November (see our note here) in which the High Court found that Mr Pickles could not abolish Regional Strategies (e.g. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:20 am by Adam Wagner
The decision is here (law report here), and Mr Pickles has said the government does not intend to appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
In re Cordua Rests., 118 USPQ2d at 1638 cited in Royal Crown v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 10:14 am by Erika Pickles
The post How DOL Opinion Letter on ‘Gig’ Economy Workers Affects California appeared first on HRWatchdog by Erika Pickles. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:43 am by Erika Pickles
In the now-reversed case, the Ninth Circuit had held that, under the federal Equal Pay Act, prior salary, whether alone or in combination with other factors, cannot justify a wage differential (Rizo v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:16 am
Some combinations are simply counter-intuitive...ice cream and pickles, waffles and fried chicken, the US House of Representatives and legal malpractice. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:41 am by Erika Pickles
The post California Employers: Beware More Stringent Criminal Background Check Requirements appeared first on HRWatchdog by Erika Pickles. [read post]