Search for: "Pike v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 11:35 am
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:15 am
Pike v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 5:42 am
Pike Brands, LLC, November 15, 2022, Gruender, R.). [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 10:57 am
See State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:40 am
The justices will decide the following issues: “(1) Whether allegations that a state law has dramatic economic effects largely outside of the state and requires pervasive changes to an integrated nationwide industry state a violation of the dormant commerce clause, or whether the extraterritoriality principle described in the Supreme Court’s decisions is now a dead letter; and (2) whether such allegations, concerning a law that is based solely on preferences… [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 6:25 am
"From "High-stakes case about pigs/National Pork Producers v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
There is no need for the Supreme Court to revive the nebulous balancing tests of yesteryear, such as Pike v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 11:30 pm
In North Dakota v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:10 pm
Here is the abstract: On October 11, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear a case, National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
See NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:06 am
National Pork Producers v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am
” Dormant Commerce Clause The laws survive the Pike balancing test: “this is simply not a case where the states’ statutes preclude economic activity or directly control commerce that occurs wholly outside of California or Alabama. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
Written by Richard Pike, Simon Yeung, Emelyne Peticca Edited by Gary J. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:14 pm
The case is captioned United States of America v. [read post]
