Search for: "Pilley v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Alberta residents are entitled to the maximum no fault benefits available in Saskatchewan
5 Oct 2007, 7:20 pm
A resident of Alberta with valid Alberta insurance injured in Saskatchewan is entitled to Saskatchewan total maximum benefits of $5,000,000.Here is the case citation: Lloyd’s Underwriters v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
A tenant exclusion endorsement is not enforceable in a Standard Mortgage Clause.
2 Feb 2010, 10:51 am by Michael Thomas
Hum v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
Ontario no-fault provisions may not apply to insured's involved in accidents outside of Ontario.
30 Sep 2009, 2:42 pm
Green v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
An insured is entitled to deduct all insurance proceeds received by an insured, including the costs incurred in obtaining the benefits.
1 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
Green v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
An insured has the inital onus to prove a loss. Once this has been satisfied the onus then sifts to the insurer to provide a defense.
10 Nov 2010, 1:56 pm by Michael Thomas
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
If a pilot allows his medical certificate to lapse he may void his insurance
19 Jul 2011, 9:11 am by Michael Thomas
Gudzinski Estate v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
The Supreme Court of Canada decision of Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada did not eliminate the distinction between primary insurance policies and excess insurance policies.
14 Aug 2007, 6:32 pm
  The Court emphasized that Family Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
If an insurer neglects to account for future payment of benefits in a settlement, the insurer could continue to be repsonsible for payment of those benefits.
5 Nov 2009, 1:47 pm by Michael Thomas
Stokes v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
Damages caused by a leaky water main may not be covered by a Homeowner's policy.
11 Jun 2009, 10:21 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
Acceptance of unpaid premiums from a beneficiary under a life insurance policy may not create an entitlement for benefits
22 Mar 2012, 9:18 am by Michael Thomas
Paul v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
Contingencies must be applied to a deduction of future entitlement to insurance benefits.
4 Feb 2010, 9:25 am by Michael Thomas
Sauer v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
Testimony of an insured's girlfriend is not sufficient to entitle a driver to coverage for damage from an unidentified driver in Ontario.
17 Aug 2011, 9:48 am by Michael Thomas
Pepe v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
Testimony of an insured's girlfriend is not sufficient to entitle a driver to coverage for damage from an unidentified driver in Ontario.
17 Aug 2011, 9:48 am by Michael Thomas
Pepe v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
An insurer is responsible for paying for the defence of an insured claim, but may not have to pay costs associated with an uninsured portion of an insured claim.
2 May 2009, 3:03 pm
Pilley. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
A missed limitation period may not be fatal to a claim against an insurer.
24 Aug 2009, 1:18 pm
Pilley. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
A defendant may be entitled to indemnification for legal costs arising from a frivolous claim.
11 Dec 2009, 11:08 am by Michael Thomas
Pilley. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
Criminal negligence falls within the intentional / criminal act exclusion.
29 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm by Michael Thomas
Pilley. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
Additional insurance purchased in Canada may not provide coverage to insureds injured abroad
21 Aug 2007, 12:24 pm
July 3, 2007.Here is a link to the decision.This case was originally digested by Sarah Swan and edited by David Pilley. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
When a potential claim could have been brought is generally a matter of fact for purposes of determining limitation periods.
9 Nov 2009, 1:52 pm by Michael Thomas
Mawji v. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/
A particular part exclusion clause will be interpreted narrowly to exclude coverage
21 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Michael Thomas
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
Canadian Insurance Blog - http://insuranceblog.harpergrey.com/