Search for: "Pimentel v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm
Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights, 78 NY2d 207, 216-217 [1991]; Batavia Lodge No. 196, Loyal Order of Moose v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 35 NY2d 143, 147 [1974]).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_01252.htm [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:14 am
Pimentel - concerning the assets of former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Rothgery v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 11:33 pm
Pimentel, a dispute over the assets of the onetime dictator of the island state, Ferdinand E. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
Acosta, Pimentel, and Penguin Random House Peru are to pay Acuña a total of 400,000 sols (US$102,608) in damages. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:13 pm
If Westlaw is to be believed, Ed’s first argument was in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 28, 2009 US v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
[L][W] Pimentel, David and Marcia Pimentel. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
Pimentel, et al. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 8:25 am
Parker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 8:25 am
Parker v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:47 pm
Pimentel, 553 U.S. 851 (2008), or if the state is the real party in interest under the line of cases I discuss in the amicus brief (Section II.B). [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
In Pimentel v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
In Pimentel v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 7:22 am
The court relied in part on State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:32 am
The Bank of the United States no longer exists, but M'Culloch v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:25 pm
When, as in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Pimentel, No. 07-1512 "Conviction for conspiracy to import with intent to distribute drugs into the US is affirmed over claims that the court erred in accepting his plea because there was no factual basis for it. [read post]
