Search for: "Piper v. Piper"
Results 121 - 140
of 517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2019, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Hernández v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am
Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher, 115 AD3d 600, 601 [2014]), and requires a showing of “egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior on the part of the defendant attorneys” (Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; Wailes v Tel Networks USA, LLC, 116 AD3d 625, 625-626 [2014]). [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am
The complaint otherwise failed to state a cause of action for breach of contract or violation of Judiciary Law § 487(1) (see generally Second Source Funding, LLC v Yellowstone Capital, LLC, 144 AD3d 445, 445-446 [1st Dept 2016]; Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird, LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 669 [1st Dept 2017]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]; CPLR 3211[a][7]). [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
Bank v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:33 am
The misconduct alleged by plaintiffs is also sufficiently “egregious” to support a Judiciary Law § 487 claim—consisting of the reiteration of allegations Balestriere knew to be false in multiple filings, even after receipt of information refuting these allegations and even after being sanctioned (see generally Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:56 am
The misconduct alleged by plaintiffs is also sufficiently “egregious” to support a Judiciary Law § 487 claim — consisting of the reiteration of allegations Balestriere knew to be false in multiple filings, even after receipt of information refuting these allegations and even after being sanctioned (see generally Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 10:50 am
However, a plaintiff’s choice of forum is not dispositive, Piper Aircraft Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 1:29 pm
Rudd v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:06 am
V. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:09 pm
The company also owns Peter Piper Pizza, a separate pizza chain with locations on the West Coast and across the Southwest United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:38 am
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 {2d Dept 2015). [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit rendered an interesting opinion in the case of King v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
Piper's discussion of that topic here). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:02 am
[New York Times] * Oracle v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:27 pm
DLA Piper and the Panopticon Blog have analysis. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Piper, 447 U. [read post]
