Search for: "Piper v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . must be stated with particularity’ ” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]). [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” lt is understood that “relief under a cause of action based upon Judiciary Law § 487 ‘is not lightly given”‘ (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610,615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2015], quoting Chowaiki & Co. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Piper Aircraft Corp., 615 F.2d 606, 611 (4th Cir.), cert. denied 448 U.S. 911 (1980). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
David Donoghue of DLA PIper in his Chicago IP Litigation Blog [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the instant complaint, while more verbose than the prior complaint, still fails to state a cause of action for “overreaching, undue influence and fraud” (see Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm by Jarod Bona
Back when I was with DLA Piper, we also worked on an amicus brief together for the NFIB in the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:15 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Supreme Court in the foundational Piper Aircraft Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615; Armstrong v Blank Rome LLP, 126 AD3d 427; Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]