Search for: "Piper v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Supreme Court’s March 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
Allegations of deceit or an intent to deceive must be stated with particularity (CPLR § 3016 [b]; Facebookv DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:03 am
Council v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:01 pm
For fans of Charles Dickens, we can call this the Jarndyce v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:27 pm
In Danielle Seaman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:38 am
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 {2d Dept 2015). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am
However, the instant complaint, while more verbose than the prior complaint, still fails to state a cause of action for “overreaching, undue influence and fraud” (see Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767). [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:35 am
Piper III of the Twelfth District Court of Appeals. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:30 am
Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615; Armstrong v Blank Rome LLP, 126 AD3d 427; Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 3:50 pm
As you might recall, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:40 am
Additionally, plaintiff’s section 487 cause of action lacks the requisite particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:16 am
Piper dissented, and would affirm summary judgment for Cora Bell. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:15 am
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 (1st Dept 2015) (internal citation omitted); Briarpatch Ltd., L.P. v Frankfurt Garbus Klein & Selz, P.C., 13 AD3d 296, 297 (1st Dept 2004). [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
Bank v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:08 am
Bank v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
–UMG v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 3:16 pm
That theory will run smack into the Rule 23 barriers created by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm
Lanning that an employee non-solicitation clause is a covenant not to compete for purposes of the State's relatively strict non-compete statute, Wis. [read post]
