Search for: "Piro v Piro" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Bayer v City of New York, 60 AD3d 713 Hank Bayer, who was employed as a plumber by the New York City Department of Education, sued the City, the Department of Education and his supervisor, Nunzio Piro, alleging, that Piro... [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
Supervisor’s comments concerning an employee’s job performance protected by a qualified privilege absent a showing of maliceBayer v City of New York, 60 AD3d 713Hank Bayer, who was employed as a plumber by the New York City Department of Education, sued the City, the Department of Education and his supervisor, Nunzio Piro, alleging, that Piro defamed him and repeatedly accused him of misconduct and insubordination. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:10 am
Supervisor's comments concerning an employee's job performance protected by a qualified privilege absent a showing of maliceBayer v City of New York, 2009 NY Slip Op 01762, Decided on March 10, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentHank Bayer, who was employed as a plumber by the New York City Department of Education, sued the City, the Department of Education and his supervisor, Nunzio Piro, alleging, that Piro defamed him and repeatedly accused him of… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Parnell, Franchise Hostages: Fast Food, God, and Politics, (Journal of Law and Politics, Vol. 29, No. 353, p. 353-396, 2014).Martha Bailey, The Marriage Law of Jane Austen's World, (Persuasions On-line, V.36, No.1 (Winter 2015)). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:08 pm
Si es así, esto hace al piro-maníaco responsable de múltiples cargos de homicidio. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
”The Board drew attention to a similar matter at issue in Warren Sign Company Inc v Piros Signs Inc (No 4) (1984),concerning the protection afforded to a technical drawing of a sign that was to be erected at Eagle Bank. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm by Bona Law PC
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]