Search for: "Pitcock v Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 3:14 am
Supreme Court properly considered the evidence submitted on the motion, including the e-mails, which conclusively disposed of plaintiffs' claims (see Pitcock v Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, 74 AD3d 613 [2010]). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:12 am
The doctrine of res judicata applies to preclude plaintiff’s claims asserted in the third action, as those claims arise out of the same transaction or series of transactions that were brought to a final conclusion in the first action by plaintiff against, among others, defendant Allan Houston (Rondeau v Houston, 2013 NY Slip Op 33363[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2013], affd 118 AD3d 638 [1st Dept 2014], lv dismissed 24 NY3d 999 [2015]; see In re Hunter, 4 NY3d 260,… [read post]
