Search for: "Pitman v. Pitman" Results 1 - 20 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2012, 6:37 am by INFORRM
  Sir Charles Gray, sitting as a Commissioner, with two Jurats (of which, more later), entered judgment for the plaintiffs on the basis that the cartoon was not defamatory (Pitman v Jersey Evening Post [2012] JRC 92). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:04 am by Dan Flynn
” The federal criminal case of the United States v Paul Kruse went to the jury by midweek after evidence was closed and submitted to the jury. [read post]
They claimed that after Roe v Wade was overturned in June 2022, the groups stopped aiding Texan women to leave the state to get abortions—because of the fear of prosecution under the states abortion ban. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 4:30 am by Matthew Pitman
This post was written by Matthew Pitman and Abigail Jones. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Federal Judge Robert Pitman set the table for the criminal trial of the United States vs. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 8:45 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Bruno Arpi, Jeffrey McGee, Andrew Jackson & Indi Hodgson-Johnston, Legal Analysis of the Argentine and Australian Titles to Territory in Antarctica David Keane, Palestine v Israel and the Collective Obligation to Condemn Apartheid under Article 3 of ICERD Eve Massingham & Dale Stephens, Autonomous Systems, Private Actors, Outer Space and War: Lessons for Addressing Accountability Concerns in Uncertain Legal Environments Ash Murphy, Climate Insecurity: The… [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas “finds the United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas found the United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
From today's decision by Judge Robert Pitman in Fund Texas Choice v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm by Simon Gibbs
” Referring to this judgment Longmore LJ, in Summit Property Ltd v Pitmans (A Firm) [2001] EWCA Civ 2020, at paragraph 16, approved this view and went further: “In my judgment, it is also no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly before he can be required to pay the costs of the other party of a particular issue on which he (the first party) has failed. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]