Search for: "Place v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 141 - 160 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
On 13 to 16 July 2020 the trial in the case of Nwakamma v Umeyor took place before HHJ Lewis. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by Christian Schröder
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Discrimination can of course occur on a wide variety of fronts including, but not limited to, employment, education, housing and insurance…, not to mention on a social level. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm by Guest Author Gary Arlen
“It’s a sad reality that there is no uniform First Amendment-compliant policy nationwide that all law enforcement officers follow [when] they respond to journalists who are covering social or civil unrest,” RTDNA’s Shelley told me. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
To some, the "triumph of... wisdom, philosophy, and reason" sounds like patriarchy and racism.And yet, as we meet here tonight, there is a growing danger that threatens every blessing our ancestors fought so hard for, struggled, they bled to secure. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding:   Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of… [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am by Nicholas Mosvick
On May 24, 1937, the Supreme Court decided in two separate but related cases that the Social Security Act of 1935 was constitutional. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm by Derek T. Muller
It includes the American Coronavirus/COVID-19 Election Safety and Security Act, or ACCESS Act. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Decisions this Week IndiaIn Re: Banners Placed on Roadside in the City of Lucknow v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Events 30 September 2020, 5RB Conference, IET Savoy Place. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 175l et seq.) at the school. (2) The term “public health emergency designation” means the declaration— (A) of a public health emergency, based on an outbreak of SARS–CoV–2 or another coronavirus with pandemic potential, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d); or (B) of a domestic emergency, based on an outbreak of SARS–CoV–2 or another … [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
A consumer might interpret the use of “not interchangeable” in a misleading way—to mean that a biosimilar couldn’t be prescribed in place of the reference product. [read post]