Search for: "Plant v. IRS"
Results 1 - 20
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2023, 4:05 am
In Iowaska Church of Healing v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:05 am
Circuit yesterday heard oral arguments in Iowaska Church of Healing v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:55 am
Judge Posner has some harsh words about the Service's position in a panel opinion issued today, Kohler Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:22 am
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
See Bunney v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:27 pm
In Monsanto v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:28 pm
In Monsanto v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:35 pm
I’ve previously noted that the federalism arguments deployed on behalf of the IRS rule authorizing tax credits on federal exchanges have the potential to disrupt other federal programs if adopted by the Supreme Court in King v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 10:01 am
” CSX Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:27 am
C-64/20 UH v An tAire Talmhaíochta Bia agus Mara, Éire and An tArd-Aighne concerned the role that a Member State’s court has in case this Member State fails to transpose a Directive into national law. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:22 pm
(Reuters/Jonathan Ernst) King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Si les interesa ir al hueso, pueden comenzar por la parte V de la Opinión de la mayoría en "Doe", allá por la página 12. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:21 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:52 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:29 am
On Wednesday morning, the Justices started with what might seem to be a minor tax case, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Luis Alberto Zambrana La decisión de Ramos v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
But pursuing litigation with little to no damages is sure to draw the ire of a busy district judge.The second case, Patch Rubber Co. v. [read post]
