Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 4,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Nevertheless, the OD dealt with the objection in substance […] by stating that claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request II were not limited to a single plant variety and were therefore allowable under A 53(b) and R 23b(4) EPC 1973. [23] Under these circumstances the objection under A 100(a) in conjunction with A 53(b) against product claims relating to tomato fruits cannot be regarded as a fresh ground of opposition which may be introduced in the appeal proceedings only with the… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:47 pm
According to Alaska State Troopers, Rick Ross, 57, Sam Pavala, 49 and Angela Chingliak were returning to Goodnews from the Coastal Villages Seafood plant in Platinum with donated food when tragedy struck. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am by Adam Craggs, Partner, RPC
The appellant argued that the VAT was a mandatory inclusion in his price which was state imposed and therefore he was collecting on behalf of the state. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm by Bartolus
Ireland ECR [2006] I-4635 (the famous "MOX Plant" case, see our post here) but that case concerned disputes between member States and the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice laid down in what is now Article 258 TFEU (ex Article 226 EC) not between investors and States. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:39 am by Lyle Denniston
Circuit Court, leading twenty-one states, the trade group for the power plants, and the trade group for the suppliers of coal to those plants to take the case on to the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am by Shari Shapiro
In essence, Murray is claiming that EPA and the states cannot double regulate power plants. [read post]