Search for: "Plas v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2020, 4:47 am by Rob Robinson
Read the complete Department of Justice announcement at Chinese Military Personnel Charged with Computer Fraud, Economic Espionage and Wire Fraud Criminal Indictment (United States of America v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:00 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
The court referred to the well-known cases of Pan Am v Aetna (relating to the hijacking of an aircraft by the PLA in 1970) and Holiday Inns v Aetna (relating to the damage to their hotel in Beirut in the 1975/6 Lebanese civil war) [Universal Cable Products, LLC; Northern Entertainment Products, LLC, v Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, US Court of Appeal for 9th Circuit, No. 17-56672, D.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:46 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
  EPA states that there is currently no statutory definition for PBSs under FIFRA and that development of a definition for PBSs would require rulemaking. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm by Rachel Brown, Wenqing Zhao
Xu, a deputy division director with the MSS’s Jiangsu State Security Department, is the first Chinese intelligence officer to be extradited for prosecution in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
  The Supreme Court addressed whether the NLRA preempted state and local laws and ordinances mandating PLAs. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
  The Supreme Court addressed whether the NLRA preempted state and local laws and ordinances mandating PLAs. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
 Port of London Authority v Paul Mendoza [2017] UKUT 146 (TCC). [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:57 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
When the Option Deed was terminated, PLA claimed it was still entitled to use the Chilean PINK LADY mark because the relevant clause of the deed stated that the licence would “last in perpetuity subject only to the quality control provisions contained herein. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:57 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
When the Option Deed was terminated, PLA claimed it was still entitled to use the Chilean PINK LADY mark because the relevant clause of the deed stated that the licence would “last in perpetuity subject only to the quality control provisions contained herein. [read post]