Search for: "Plaxico v State"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm
In an essay forthcoming in a symposium issue of the Syracuse Law Review, I argue that taken at face value, DC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:21 am
Now, the big Second Amendment case that came down this summer, U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 9:18 am
As noted in a decision published today in People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 8:59 am
But he moves on to his big point, using the Supreme Court's new Second Amendment decision -- District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
That said, I suspect that lots of state prosecutors ought to share the local DA's concern that this ruling in Miller v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
That said, I suspect that lots of state prosecutors ought to share the local DA's concern that this ruling in Miller v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:09 pm
I mean, he is Plaxico Burress! [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
In fact, with Plaxico Burress having a hard time getting a favorable plea deal (basics here), his lawyers perhaps out to seriously consider heading over to the federal courts in Foley Square to assert Second Amendment claims in an effort to force New York state prosecutors to back off. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:30 pm
Only one state constitutional provision addressing the right to bear arms contains an exception for felons. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 12:08 am
Item: Plaxico Burress pleads guilty to shooting himself in the leg and gets two years. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 am
The plaintiffs in this lawsuit argue that the NFL™ is not an employer because the individual teams are considered separate entities under the law, citing to American Needle v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:49 am
Posts by Lyle Denniston here and here provide the basic story of Hayes, which will appear (and may be reported) to be just a technical little statutory interpretation case: The Court has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 am
The plaintiffs in this lawsuit argue that the NFL™ is not an employer because the individual teams are considered separate entities under the law, citing to American Needle v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:20 am
That California judge, featured in Time Magazine,[v] is William W. [read post]
