Search for: "Plumbers Local Union No. 5"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2006, 2:18 pm
" The Board, in reversing the judge, agreed with the General Counsel's argument that this case is governed by the Board's decision in Plumbers Local 375, 228 NLRB 1191, 1195 (1977), in which the Board found that a joint apprenticeship training committee was an agent of the union and the employer who jointly created it through their collective-bargaining agreement. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:26 pm
The work was also claimed by Sheet Metal Workers Local 27. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
In that decision, the Board granted the General Counsel's and Union's motions for reconsideration and found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by withdrawing recognition from Plumbers Local 357, revising its job application procedure without notice to Local 357, and failing to provide a response to Local 357's information request. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
(A recent study showed the top 5% of earners account for nearly 40% of total spending in the economy.) [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Germany uses a mixture of proportional and majority systems in order to ensure that the proportion of parliamentary seats a party receives is exactly the same as the proportion of voters favoring that party (if that proportion is bigger than 5%) while also allowing for local representation. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:41 pm
She then reviewed the substantial effects of economic collapse after the end of the Soviet Union, from out of which Cuba resorted to a social program expenditure and debt financing model. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:58 am
The plaintiff, Plumbers Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund, argued that Morrison did not preclude their claims, even though the transaction on which they had acquired their shares had taken place on a London-based subsidiary of the Swiss stock exchange. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
