Search for: "Ply v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by lpcprof
The City's ordinance states: "It shall be unlawful for any person to conduct the business of, solicit for, or ply the trade of fortune teller, clairvoyant, hypnotist, spiritualist, palmist, phrenologist, or other mystic endowed with supernatural powers. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
While we’re on the subject of alcohol and rational deliberation (presuming at least a process of ‘democratic deliberation within’ before casting one’s vote), Elster also notes that in Tanner v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am by Tara Hofbauer
Paul discussed the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm by Kevin Goldberg
 Big majorities of the Court have been wrong before (obvious examples: Plessy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:21 am by NL
Barking & Dagenham LBC v Bakare, Imevbore & Imevbore. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:21 am by NL
Barking & Dagenham LBC v Bakare, Imevbore & Imevbore. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:55 am by Eugene Volokh
” Over at Forbes.com, IJ Communications Associate Nick Sibilla explains why the High Court’s decision in Nelson v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/ON5e4Dgt2y -> New anti-spam laws aimed at safer online world http://t.co/4KVM3vv5BL -> Organisations using privacy policies 'to protect themselves', says ICO http://t.co/ZEydJ1rB4U -> ASCAP President Paul Williams’ “State Of The Union” To Songwriters! [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:17 am
  Ironically, the iconic decision, Roe v. [read post]